[Cryptography] jammers, nor not

Ray Dillinger bear at sonic.net
Tue Feb 28 17:27:48 EST 2017



On 02/28/2017 06:06 AM, mok-kong shen wrote:
> 
> I vaguely remember to have read in a book that in US a permission
> is needed to have a Faraday-shielded conference room.

That is not the case, at least for private citizens/companies.
I have been in several meetings that were held in such rooms.

There's a particular way to interpret the public meetings
act that could be construed to make such a requirement
on rooms used by public officials where blocking, eg, radio
and TV live coverage would be "unreasonable."  But I am no
attorney, and haven't heard of any actual cases testing
that hypothesis.

				Bear



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20170228/fc587fd6/attachment.sig>


More information about the cryptography mailing list