[Cryptography] EFF amicus brief in support of Apple
Allen
allenpmd at gmail.com
Sat Mar 5 11:50:57 EST 2016
> There’s no difference between a digital signature and a regular
signature. Both have the same semantics: endorsement of the content being
signed.
Well, that a huge stretch right there. Who says a digital signature
implies endorsement of the content? "Endorsement of the content" is either
a social or legal construct. As a social construct, it consists of
whatever we say it does, and as a legal construct--which is what matters
here--it consists of whatever the courts say it does. Just because
computer people use the term "digital signature" does not make it a true
legal signature. If the court says that being forced to provide a "digital
signature" to unlock a device is not an endorsement and not even a
signature from a legal point of view, then it is not.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20160305/7a41b641/attachment.html>
More information about the cryptography
mailing list