[Cryptography] From Nicaragua to Snowden - why no national standards should be considered in cryptosec

Donald Eastlake d3e3e3 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 26 22:49:58 EST 2016


On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Stephen Farrell
<stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> I think likely the best we can do is to annotate cipher code points
> (e.g. in IANA registries) as being "desirable" or "other" and to
> discourage everyone from implementing "other." If we can come up
> with an acceptable but disparaging term for "other" that'd be great
> ("crap" has been suggested but might not be effective).

What's wrong with the typical standards term "deprecated"?

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3 at gmail.com


More information about the cryptography mailing list