[Cryptography] Implementing full Internet IPv6 end-to-end encryption based on Cryptographically Generated Address

grarpamp grarpamp at gmail.com
Tue Jan 22 23:57:41 EST 2019


On 1/22/19, Natanael <natanael.l at gmail.com> wrote:
> You're exaggerating the issue.

No. CJDNS chose to squat address space that
conflicts with pre existing IANA usage schemas
regarding special allocations, and further conflicts
with users (both end users and corp, gov, edu, etc.
all in private context) correct and conformant use of
said allocations. As before, CJDNS had more
appropriate options and didn't use them.

Nor should sys and net admins, and even 3rd party
app developers, have to do such extra monkey work.
IANA RFC says users / admins / apps should be free
from conflict there. But they aren't, no thanks to CJDNS.

Until CJDNS renumbers, it bears all responsibility,
and will continue to risk growth and usage due to
IPv6 conflicts that shouldn't be there in the first place.

Other than that, CJDNS is a cool project.


More information about the cryptography mailing list