[Cryptography] Implementing full Internet IPv6 end-to-end encryption based on Cryptographically Generated Address

[Ttttabcd]

> On 1/22/19, Natanael natanael.l at gmail.com wrote:
>
> > You're exaggerating the issue.
>
> No. CJDNS chose to squat address space that
> conflicts with pre existing IANA usage schemas
> regarding special allocations, and further conflicts
> with users (both end users and corp, gov, edu, etc.
> all in private context) correct and conformant use of
> said allocations. As before, CJDNS had more
> appropriate options and didn't use them.
>
> Nor should sys and net admins, and even 3rd party
> app developers, have to do such extra monkey work.
> IANA RFC says users / admins / apps should be free
> from conflict there. But they aren't, no thanks to CJDNS.
>
> Until CJDNS renumbers, it bears all responsibility,
> and will continue to risk growth and usage due to
> IPv6 conflicts that shouldn't be there in the first place.
>
> Other than that, CJDNS is a cool project.
>
> The cryptography mailing list
> cryptography at metzdowd.com
> http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography


Yes, I also feel that it should not conflict with the existing situation, otherwise it will be difficult to promote. If it can be built under the existing routing mechanism, the promotion will be much simpler.