[Cryptography] USG Moves to Vacate Apple Decrypt Order

[John Levine]

>> USG Moves to Vacate Apple Decrypt Order
>> 
>> <https://t.co/qkQflTOzru>https://cryptome.org/2016/03/usg-apple-209.pdf 
>
>Does Apple have to respond? Can they respond? Did they respond? Would we know? Is a “Motion to Vacate” the end of this case regardless? 

Unless the judge denies the motion to vacate the order, which is
extremely unlikely, the case is over.  I just checked PACER and
there's nothing yet since document 209.

R's,
John