[Cryptography] More efficient and just as secure to sign message hash using Ed25519?

[Tony Arcieri]

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Allen <allenpmd at gmail.com> wrote:

> Who claimed there is "no added robustness"?  It certainly wasn't me.  I
> specifically said there was a very small marginal benefit, but that I
> thought it was not the best use of the resources required.


Exploiting hash collisions in digital signature algorithms have lead to
real-world attacks. See e.g. Flame MD5 collision.

-- 
Tony Arcieri
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20150803/191a26cd/attachment.html>