[Cryptography] Post-quantum cryptography NIST and others

[Jacob Christian Munch-Andersen]

On Tue, Aug 4, 2026, at 12:29 AM, Cryptographer via cryptography wrote:
> This site makes serious claims and proposes a patented alternative, which I think are too serious to ignore.

They are too patented to not ignore. The standards themselves are obviously dead in the water. But what a patent troll might still do is to claim that some other standard takes their ideas, and start demanding royalties. As a cryptographer, merely reading the standard poses a risk.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20260804/145386bf/attachment.htm>