
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><title></title></head><body><div>On Tue, Aug 4, 2026, at 12:29 AM, Cryptographer via cryptography wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite" id="qt" style=""><div id="qt-atomic-mail-body"><div><div><span class="qt-font-semibold"><span style="">This</span> <span style="">site</span> <span style="">makes</span> <span style="">serious</span> <span style="">claims</span> <span style="">and</span> <span style="">proposes</span> <span style="">a</span> <span style="">patented</span> <span style="">alternative,</span> <span style="">which</span> <span style="">I</span> <span style="">think</span> <span style="">are</span> <span style="">too</span> <span style="">serious</span> <span style="">to</span> <span style="">ignore.</span></span><br></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>They are too patented to not ignore. The standards themselves are obviously dead in the water. But what a patent troll might still do is to claim that some other standard takes their ideas, and start demanding royalties. As a cryptographer, merely reading the standard poses a risk.</div></body></html>