[Cryptography] Has quantum cryptanalysis actually achieved anything?
Kent Borg
kentborg at borg.org
Mon Feb 24 22:33:28 EST 2025
On 2/24/25 2:03 PM, Jon Callas wrote:
> (Cue the Bohr aphorism about how predictions are difficult, especially about the future.)
Actually, as humans, predicting the future is our superpower. We predict
the future a lot. We depend on it. It is why 30-year mortgages are possible!
What is hard is predicting things we don't really understand. And what
is *really* galling is not being better at predicting the future than
are all our fellow humans. (I want to predict the stock market!)
-kb
P.S. Harder than predicting the future is predicting the *past*. ("If
instead of A happening not-A had happened, then clearly foobar would
have resulted.") Because the past isn't coming at us we can make asinine
"would have happened" statements all we want, and as the past is
politely receding it doesn't smack us in the face with a contradiction,
No, not in the way the insensitive future does. Instead we get to assert
that silly cliché "hindsight is 20/20" and we get to believe it. But
'taint true.
More information about the cryptography
mailing list