[Cryptography] Plata: A Quantum-Enhanced DAG-based Electronic Cash System

[Viktor S. Kristensen]

Dear Kenny,

Thank you for your interest in Plata! I apologize for the repository access issue - we're currently migrating our codebase and implementing some final security audits before making it fully public. I expect the repository to be accessible within the next few weeks.

Regarding the 33% threshold - you raise an excellent point about nation-state actors. The 33% Byzantine fault tolerance (BFT) limit was indeed an initial theoretical constraint of our consensus mechanism, similar to other DAG-based systems. However, I'm excited to share that we've just completed implementation of a revolutionary hybrid consensus mechanism that fundamentally transforms this security model, drawing inspiration from both ancient cryptographic wisdom and cutting-edge quantum mechanics.

Our new system achieves enhanced security through three interwoven consensus layers:

1. Proof-of-Work Layer (40% weight):
   - Traditional computational work similar to Bitcoin
   - Provides baseline resistance against computational attacks
   - Maintains compatibility with existing mining infrastructure
   - Requires massive hardware investment to attack

2. DAG Consensus Layer (35% weight):
   - Parallel validation with quantum-enhanced MCMC tip selection
   - Requires stake-weighted validator participation
   - Enables scalable transaction throughput
   - Makes sustained attacks exponentially more expensive

3. Quantum Verification Layer (25% weight):
   - Quantum signature verification with decoherence tracking
   - Entanglement-based validator selection
   - Quantum foam topology validation
   - Provides resistance against quantum computing threats

This trilateral security approach means an attacker would need to:
1. Control >40% of total hash power AND
2. Control >35% of staked validators AND
3. Break quantum-resistant signatures

Additionally, we've implemented several critical safeguards:

1. Our quantum-inspired decoherence tracking makes it computationally expensive to maintain multiple conflicting transaction histories, effectively increasing the cost of a malicious takeover.

2. The DAG topology means that attackers need to control not just 33% of nodes, but maintain that control consistently across multiple confirmation layers, making sustained attacks significantly more resource-intensive than in linear blockchain systems.

3. The network's quantum resistance features actually help here - the same mechanisms that protect against quantum computing attacks also make it harder to coordinate large-scale malicious behavior.

The beauty of this system lies in its composition - much like the ancient Chinese Remainder Theorem derived its strength from multiple independent mathematical relationships. In practice, an attacker would need to control roughly 70-80% of total network resources across multiple security domains to successfully compromise the system.

This means that even a nation-state actor would need to:
a) Develop massive classical computing resources
b) Acquire and maintain significant stake in the network
c) Develop quantum capabilities
d) Sustain control across all three domains simultaneously

This is fundamentally different from Bitcoin's single 51% threshold - rather than betting everything on one security mechanism, we create security through the interweaving of multiple independent factors, similar to how biological systems use multiple layers of defense.

That said, we're always working to strengthen these protections further through additional consensus layers and reputation systems. I'd be very interested in your thoughts on potential approaches and any specific concerns about the threat model you're envisioning. This kind of feedback is extremely valuable as we continue developing the system.

Best regards,
Viktor
@viktorakademe (x.com)
Discord: https://discord.gg/jEhaYtAhfx

P.S. For those interested in the quantum aspects, I've detailed the decoherence calculations and quantum foam topology models in the technical specifications section of the whitepaper.


Really important if something matters

Sendt med Proton Mail sikker e-mail.

fredag den 15. november 2024 kl. 13:21, skrev Kenny Joseph <kajoseph2 at msn.com>:

> I have a gitlab account, but the repo link leads to a 404 Page Not Found.
> 

> This project seems interesting and I'm curious to know more, but one thing that stuck out to me from the white paper (besides the AI art) is that the consensus mechanism is only resistant for up to 33% malicious participants. This seems dangerously low when you consider nation states. Bitcoin's 50% resistance at least means that if China, Russia, and the US are all mining then it's unlikely either will gain a majority of mining power. But with Plata, either one could independently decide to act maliciously.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20241117/85ac0b23/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: publickey - overdrevetfedmetodologi at pm.me - 0x5F4716BA.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 1722 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20241117/85ac0b23/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 583 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20241117/85ac0b23/attachment.sig>