[Cryptography] Why Quantum Cryptanalysis is Bollocks
Ralf Senderek
crypto at senderek.ie
Sat Aug 3 06:39:46 EDT 2024
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> I estimate there to be at least a 1% chance that someone will build a CRQC
> within a decade, it is highly unlikely to be much more [...]
>
> The notion that you can stack quantum states infinitely is not proven by
> experiment and there is a good reason to suspect you can't - the states
> collapse. What if the probability of collapse increases with the number of
> stacked states?
You have just stated the empirical reason why the chance is not 1% but
probably 0.0001% or much less. So what is the reason to direct as many
resources to fend against this "threat" given all the other problems
we face?
Ralf
More information about the cryptography
mailing list