[Cryptography] Our leader opines on cryptocurrencies

jamesd at echeque.com jamesd at echeque.com
Tue Jul 23 10:54:53 EDT 2019


On 2019-07-22 5:35 am, james hughes via cryptography wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jul 20, 2019, at 8:32 PM, jamesd at echeque.com 
>> <mailto:jamesd at echeque.com> wrote:
>>
>> Assume the processing is shardable with mutually trusting shards that 
>> do not suffer byzantine failure.

> If there is mutual trust

Reread.

No mutual trust between peers.  The shards that trust each other live 
within a single rack owned by a single peer.  Trust does not extend 
outside that rack.

The sharding is to enable peers to be big enough.

The shards are not peers.

The clients are not peers

Scaling is achieved by multiple hierarchies each splitting the problem 
in different dimensions.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



More information about the cryptography mailing list