[Cryptography] Regulations of Tempest protections of buildings

mok-kong shen mok-kong.shen at t-online.de
Fri Apr 7 16:57:24 EDT 2017


Am 07.04.2017 um 22:03 schrieb RB:
> The basement story is likely an unintentional strawman. Here's my own
> anecdata that's even more troublesome to your line of argument:
> As a forensic analyst, one of the first things I do when tasked with
> collecting and examining a phone is to place it in a grounded Faraday
> cage with a power feed to the device.  My explicit intent is to
> disrupt communication with that device.  This happens many hundreds of
> times daily, all over the US, done both by private and law enforcement
> investigators.  None of us have been found to be breaking the law by
> doing this, and not for lack of opponents trying to argue otherwise.
Thank you for the valuable informations. Allow me though a question: Why 
do you
continue to power feed the device, if you desire to disrupt 
communications with it?
Wouldn't anyway be better to cut off its power supply?

M. K. Shen



More information about the cryptography mailing list