[Cryptography] Regulations of Tempest protections of buildings

[Watson Ladd]

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 9:07 AM, mok-kong shen <mok-kong.shen at t-online.de> wrote:
> Am 05.04.2017 um 21:42 schrieb Patrick Chkoreff:
>
>> mok-kong shen wrote on 04/05/2017 02:40 PM:
>>
>>> Via building a Farady cage, a person ..... causes interference to
>>> ......, right?
>>
>> I would hope that the law distinguishes between passive absorption and
>> active transmission.  I doubt I am in legal jeopardy just because I
>> can't receive 97.1 FM "The River" in my underground concrete shelter.
>> On the other hand, if I start sparking out RF waves saying "I am John
>> Galt" over the top of a Joe Walsh tune, that might receive a different
>> legal treatment.
>
> How about warnings of earthquakes, tornados etc., or even orders of
> evacuation which
> you fail to obtain?

Your own damn fault. There is no requirement to own a radio capable of
receiving these transmissions.
>
> M. K. Shen
>
> _______________________________________________
> The cryptography mailing list
> cryptography at metzdowd.com
> http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography



-- 
"Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains".
--Rousseau.