[Cryptography] Regulations of Tempest protections of buildings

[Shawn K. Quinn]

On 04/02/2017 10:48 AM, mok-kong shen wrote:
> I wrote previously in a  follow-up to a thread that I vaguely remember
> to have read
> that in US a permission is needed for Farady shielding of rooms,
> whereupon a few
> readers doubted its correctness. I have just succeeded to again find the
> source:

I won't believe this is true until someone cites the statute, and
exactly which agency needs to issue a license to make it legal. I would
also like to know the rationale for requiring a license, i.e., what are
they trying to prevent by not allowing any random goober to
Faraday/Tempest shield their building?

-- 
Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn at rushpost.com>
http://www.rantroulette.com
http://www.skqrecordquest.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20170402/72414514/attachment.sig>