[Cryptography] letter versus spirit of the law ... UB delenda est
Ron Garret
ron at flownet.com
Sun Oct 25 17:33:59 EDT 2015
On Oct 25, 2015, at 5:41 AM, Jerry Leichter <leichter at lrw.com> wrote:
> If you think the issue is C - suggest a good alternative.
Common Lisp. Seriously. If you constrain yourself to a particular subset of Common Lisp then you can get constant-time bounds-checked code that doesn’t cons (and hence does not invoke GC) using the language as currently defined and compilers as they currently exist. You can even layer a C-like syntax on top of it and make a crypto-specific C-like DSL without too much pain.
rg
More information about the cryptography
mailing list