[Cryptography] FFS

[Tom Mitchell]

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:38 PM, ianG <iang at iang.org> wrote:

> On 20/03/2015 13:11 pm, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
>
>> I abhor the term "perfect forward secrecy", as being inaccurate unless
>> an OTP is used for perfection -
>>
>
> Hell yeah.
>
> A bunch of us have been using the term 'protocol forward security'.


It makes sense to write a paper and find some set of places
to discuss and nail down these choices.

A good paper or good blog link posted here... is all you need to
start a WP article to disambiguate or link them.

Sloppy language that fails to be challenged generates more slop.



-- 
  T o m    M i t c h e l l
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20150323/dfc45764/attachment.html>