[Cryptography] What do we mean by Secure?
Richard Outerbridge
outer at interlog.com
Mon Feb 9 23:54:47 EST 2015
On 2015-02-09 (40), at 23:06:48, alex at alten.org wrote:
>
> Quoting Kent Borg <kentborg at borg.org>:
>
>> On 02/09/2015 02:08 AM, alex at alten.org wrote:
>>> For myself security is just another engineering domain, like software
>>> or electrical engineering.
>> [….]
>
> No engineering discipline is perfect, think of crashed airplanes,
> sunk boats, or collapsed bridges.
The Romans, for THE example of engineers, are said to have made
their architects stand below their arches as the first loads passed
overhead.
> Your rightly point out that Security engineering has differences
> from other engineering disciplines.
>
> It usually has to prove a negative, which is a key difference.
I think I was taught that was logically, literally, impossible.
Wasn’t that how Turing’s Bombe worked?
__outer
More information about the cryptography
mailing list