[Cryptography] List of Proven Secure Ciphers / Hashes

Jerry Leichter leichter at lrw.com
Mon Sep 15 19:47:22 EDT 2014


On Sep 15, 2014, at 5:31 PM, Jerry Leichter <leichter at lrw.com> wrote:

> On Sep 15, 2014, at 5:18 PM, Bear <bear at sonic.net> wrote:
>>> No.  RSA is no harder than factoring (we still have no proof that it's *as hard as factoring*).  
>> 
>> Wait.  If I have both members of an RSA key pair, can't I do 
>> Euclidean reduction (which is only O(logN)) to find the factors
>> of the key modulus?
> Yes, but that's breaking RSA *for the private key*.  Suppose I have a method that decrypts one in 10 messages encrypted with a given private key, but *without* directly revealing the public key.
Urk.  Exchange "public" and "private".
                                                        -- Jerry

>   (No one can even suggest a way one might do this, but imagine such an algorithm exists.)  Can you turn that into a factoring algorithm?

>                                                        -- Jerry
> 
> _______________________________________________
> The cryptography mailing list
> cryptography at metzdowd.com
> http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography



More information about the cryptography mailing list