[Cryptography] List of Proven Secure Ciphers / Hashes
Jerry Leichter
leichter at lrw.com
Mon Sep 15 19:47:22 EDT 2014
On Sep 15, 2014, at 5:31 PM, Jerry Leichter <leichter at lrw.com> wrote:
> On Sep 15, 2014, at 5:18 PM, Bear <bear at sonic.net> wrote:
>>> No. RSA is no harder than factoring (we still have no proof that it's *as hard as factoring*).
>>
>> Wait. If I have both members of an RSA key pair, can't I do
>> Euclidean reduction (which is only O(logN)) to find the factors
>> of the key modulus?
> Yes, but that's breaking RSA *for the private key*. Suppose I have a method that decrypts one in 10 messages encrypted with a given private key, but *without* directly revealing the public key.
Urk. Exchange "public" and "private".
-- Jerry
> (No one can even suggest a way one might do this, but imagine such an algorithm exists.) Can you turn that into a factoring algorithm?
> -- Jerry
>
> _______________________________________________
> The cryptography mailing list
> cryptography at metzdowd.com
> http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
More information about the cryptography
mailing list