[Cryptography] BLAKE2: "Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger" Than MD5

Tony Arcieri bascule at gmail.com
Sun Mar 23 14:20:07 EDT 2014

On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:16 PM, <dj at deadhat.com> wrote:

> But there is no obvious consensus body
> that we can point to for sound algorithm selection. If I select Blake2,
> put it in a substantial fraction of the CPUs out there and it's
> subsequently broken, that's my fault.

The original BLAKE was a SHA3 finalist. You can at least point to that.

Tony Arcieri
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20140323/d069ea80/attachment.html>

More information about the cryptography mailing list