stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
Mon Sep 30 03:13:29 EDT 2013
> On 29 Sep 2013, at 08:51, ianG <iang at iang.org> wrote:
>> On 28/09/13 20:07 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> b) is TLS1.3 (hopefully) and maybe some extensions for earlier
>> versions of TLS as well
> SSL/TLS is a history of fiddling around at the edges. If there is to be any hope, start again. Remember, we know so much more now. Call it TLS2 if you want.
> Start with a completely radical set of requirements. Then make it so. There are a dozen people here who could do it.
> Why not do the requirements, then ask for competing proposals? Choose 1. It worked for NIST, and committees didn't work for anyone.
> A competition for TLS2 would bring out the best and leave the bureaurats fuming and powerless.
Sounds like a suggestion to make on the tls wg list. It might get some support, though I'd guess not everyone would want to do that
> The cryptography mailing list
> cryptography at metzdowd.com
More information about the cryptography