[Cryptography] TLS2

[Stephen Farrell]

> On 29 Sep 2013, at 08:51, ianG <iang at iang.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 28/09/13 20:07 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> 
>> b) is TLS1.3 (hopefully) and maybe some extensions for earlier
>>    versions of TLS as well
> 
> 
> SSL/TLS is a history of fiddling around at the edges.  If there is to be any hope, start again.  Remember, we know so much more now.  Call it TLS2 if you want.
> 
> Start with a completely radical set of requirements.  Then make it so. There are a dozen people here who could do it.
> 
> Why not do the requirements, then ask for competing proposals?  Choose 1.  It worked for NIST, and committees didn't work for anyone.
> 
> A competition for TLS2 would bring out the best and leave the bureaurats fuming and powerless.
> 

Sounds like a suggestion to make on the tls wg list. It might get some support, though I'd guess not everyone would want to do that

S

S

> 
> iang
> _______________________________________________
> The cryptography mailing list
> cryptography at metzdowd.com
> http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography