[Cryptography] RSA equivalent key length/strength

Lodewijk andré de la porte l at odewijk.nl
Sun Sep 29 13:14:52 EDT 2013


2013/9/29 James A. Donald <jamesd at echeque.com>

> (..) fact, they are not provably random, selected (...)
>
fixed that for you

It seems obvious that blatant lying about qualities of procedures must have
some malignant intention, yet ignorance is as good an explanation. I don't
think lying the other way would solve anything. It's obviously not
especially secure.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20130929/1881909b/attachment.html>


More information about the cryptography mailing list