[Cryptography] RSA equivalent key length/strength

Lodewijk andré de la porte l at odewijk.nl
Sun Sep 29 13:14:52 EDT 2013

2013/9/29 James A. Donald <jamesd at echeque.com>

> (..) fact, they are not provably random, selected (...)
fixed that for you

It seems obvious that blatant lying about qualities of procedures must have
some malignant intention, yet ignorance is as good an explanation. I don't
think lying the other way would solve anything. It's obviously not
especially secure.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20130929/1881909b/attachment.html>

More information about the cryptography mailing list