[Cryptography] Opening Discussion: Speculation on "BULLRUN"
Jon Callas
jon at callas.org
Sat Sep 7 00:31:33 EDT 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 6, 2013, at 8:22 PM, Jerry Leichter <leichter at lrw.com> wrote:
> I'm sorry, but this is just nonsense. You're starting with informal, rough definitions and claiming a mathematical theorem.
Actually, I'm doing the opposite. I'm starting with a theorem and arguing informally from there. And yes, I know it's informal. I'm starting with the math and then arguing as an engineer -- it doesn't make sense do go the way you're suggesting when there are other paths that are known to be worth doing. Oh, and we know that the NSA is doing.
I don't see that it is nonsense to argue that if I were an evil genius, I'd go here for these reasons and then note that that is actually the direction that we know the NSA is going.
I'm saying that the math and the facts on the ground point thataway.
Jon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 3.2.0 (Build 1672)
Charset: us-ascii
wj8DBQFSKqwnsTedWZOD3gYRAt7mAKCixgTnDyPELwAXE4EYiGyAEuZiDgCdGjNh
XFLRfjVoUHa9yRKd9c7rdss=
=OP+p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the cryptography
mailing list