[Cryptography] Sha3

[Jerry Leichter]

On Oct 5, 2013, at 11:54 AM, radix42 at gmail.com wrote:
> Jerry Leichter wrote:
>> Currently we have SHA-128 and SHA-256, >but exactly why one should choose one or >the other has never been clear - SHA-256 is >somewhat more expensive, but I can't >think of any examples where SHA-128 >would be practical but SHA-256 would not.  >In practice, when CPU is thought to be an >issue (rightly or wrongly), people have >gone with RC4 - standards be damned.
> 
> SHA-224/256 (there is no SHA-128) use 32-bit words, SHA-384/512 uses 64-bit words. That difference is indeed a very big deal in embedded device applications. SHA-3 uses only 64-bit words, which will likely preclude it being used in most embedded devices for the foreseeable future. 
Oops - acronym confusion between brain and keyboard.  I meant to talk about AES-128 and AES-256.
                                                        -- Jerry