[Cryptography] encoding formats should not be committee'ized

Tue Oct 1 05:05:29 EDT 2013

On 1 October 2013 09:46, James A. Donald <jamesd at echeque.com> wrote:

>  On 2013-10-01 18:06, Ben Laurie wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 1 October 2013 01:10, James A. Donald <jamesd at echeque.com> wrote:
>
> Further, google is unhappy that too-clever-code gives too-clever
>> programmers too much power, and has prohibited its employees from ever
>> doing something like protobufs again.
>
>
>  Wat? Sez who?
>
>    Protobufs is code generating code.  Not allowed by google style guide.
>

News to me - where does it say that?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20131001/835fd1bf/attachment.html>