A mighty fortress is our PKI, Part II
Nicolas Williams
Nicolas.Williams at oracle.com
Wed Jul 28 12:20:52 EDT 2010
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:18:56PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> Again, I understand that in a technological sense, in an ideal world,
> they would be equivalent. However, the big difference, again, is that
> you can't run Kerberos with no KDC, but you can run a PKI without an
> OCSP server. The KDC is impossible to leave out of the system. That is
> a really nice technological feature.
Whether PKI can run w/o OCSP is up to the relying parties. Today,
because OCSP is an afterthought, they have little choice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at metzdowd.com
More information about the cryptography
mailing list