Quiet in the list...

[Ben Laurie]

IanG wrote:
> 2.  GPG + Engimail + Thunderbird.  Will never be totally robust because
> there is too much dependency.

What does this mean? GPG + Enigmail, whilst not the best architecture I
ever heard of, is a tiny increment to the complexity of Thunderbird.

Are you saying anything other than "big software has bugs"?

-- 
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html           http://www.links.org/

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at metzdowd.com