[off-topic, but not by ukcrypto standards] ukcrypto-moderated pre-moderators needed

[Ben Laurie]

Peter Fairbrother wrote:
> Ben Laurie wrote:
> 
> 
>>OK, since my previous attempt to create a lower volume
>>ukcrypto-like-thing failed, I have concluded that the only way to handle
>>the problem is to produce a moderated version of ukcrypto. I know for
>>sure there's demand for this, but I also know that the volume is too
>>high for traditional moderation methods (at least too high for _me_ to
>>use traditional moderation).
> 
> 
> I have a question. What do you think is on topic?
> 
> 
> The original charter, as I understand it, was to discuss UK legislation
> relating to cryptography - which is fine, but very little is happening in
> that area right now, and there would be virtually no posts.

I would include privacy and anonymity as well as cryptography. I'm open 
to persuasion for other topics.

Killing time isn't one of them.

-- 
ApacheCon! 13-17 November! http://www.apachecon.com/

http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html       http://www.thebunker.net/

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at metzdowd.com