Problems with GPG El Gamal signing keys?

[Ralf Senderek]

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Werner Koch wrote:

> Yes, yes, I should have removed ElGamal signing key support back in
> 1998 when there was no more need for it.  I recall that some folks
> begged me not to do that and I took the wrong decision.

I think no-one will blame you for this, you couldn't have known the
effects. But what are we going to learn? Heading for far less complexity
is the future!

   Regards

       Ralf Senderek


*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*
* Ralf Senderek  <ralf at senderek.de> http://senderek.de  *  What is privacy  *
* Sandstr. 60   D-41849 Wassenberg  +49 2432-3960       *      without      *
* PGP: AB 2C 85 AB DB D3 10 E7  CD A4 F8 AC 52 FC A9 ED *    Pure Crypto?   *
49466008763407508762442876812634724277805553224967086648493733366295231438448

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at metzdowd.com