CFP: PKI research workshop

[lynn.wheeler at firstdata.com]

well PAIN is out of some standards organization (as is 3-factor
authentication) .... i agree that privacy and confidentiality is sometimes
thot of as different .... but others argue that it reduces to the
effectively the same requirements ... even tho different people have
different connotations with the two terms.

i had fumble fingered 3-4 URLs yesterday .... and the posting to correct
them seems to have gotten suspended for some time in the ether .... note
however the url for the security taxonomy and glossary had been typed
correctly in a posting made earlier in the day ... i.e.
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/secure.htm



warlord at mit.edu on 1/2/2002 7:37 am wrote:


Lynn,

I think you should specify "confidentiality" as another issue to be
addressed.  Perhaps you include confidentiality in your "privacy" or
"security" subsections, but I've found that many people think (and
mean) different things when they use these two terms.  For example, is
privacy necessarily privacy of communicated data from eavesdroppers,
or is it the privacy of personal information (perhaps the privacy of
the authentication information) so an eavesdropper does not know who
is communicating?

Unfortunately your garlic.com URL (security.htm) does not work and
returns an HTTP 404 error.

-derek







---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at wasabisystems.com