limits of watermarking (Re: First Steganographic Image in the Wild)

Ben Laurie ben at algroup.co.uk
Wed Oct 17 12:59:39 EDT 2001


Matt Crawford wrote:
> 
> > a) I believe physical media will always have higher bandwidth than
> > broadband - why? Because you have to feed the broadband from somewhere,
> > and archive it somewhere.
> 
> You can use an expensive physical medium to drive your transmission.
> If you sell atoms, you have to use a cheap medium.

I'll admit that my argument doesn't stand up to severe testing - but I
think it is important that in general the receivers of the stream will
also want to store it (certainly my almost complete transition to
TiVo-ized TV viewing [what little I do] would support that theory :-).
Which is what I meant by "archive it somewhere", but I see now was far
from clear.

Cheers,

Ben.

--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff



---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at wasabisystems.com




More information about the cryptography mailing list