[Cryptography] NSA and cryptanalysis

Joachim Strömbergson Joachim at Strombergson.com
Thu Sep 5 05:26:22 EDT 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Aloha!

Jerry Leichter wrote:
> On Sep 1, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 07:11:06 -0400 Jerry Leichter
>> <leichter at lrw.com> wrote:
>>> Meanwhile, just what evidence do we really have that AES is 
>>> secure?
>> The fact that the USG likes using it, too.
> We know they *say in public* that it's acceptable.  But do we know
> what they *actually use*?
> 
>> That's also evidence for eliptic curve techniques btw.
> Same problem.

(Slightly tangential but on topic I hope)

Am I the only surprised that the NSA designed block ciphers SIMON and
SPECK is vulnerable to differential attacks?

http://eprint.iacr.org/2013/543

If I understand the history correctly NSA supported the development of
DES as well as SHA-0/SHA-1 and their contributions shows knowledge about
differential attacks at least as far back as 1977.

- -- 
Med vänlig hälsning, Yours

Joachim Strömbergson - Alltid i harmonisk svängning.
========================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlIoTj4ACgkQZoPr8HT30QH91gCg4aRb6tf1d6a5mOnBrF0/GP6c
NwIAnRuB99lNpz04/WG0trIQU9ZKnW9A
=4r0M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the cryptography mailing list