[Cryptography] NSA and cryptanalysis
Joachim Strömbergson
Joachim at Strombergson.com
Thu Sep 5 05:26:22 EDT 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Aloha!
Jerry Leichter wrote:
> On Sep 1, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 07:11:06 -0400 Jerry Leichter
>> <leichter at lrw.com> wrote:
>>> Meanwhile, just what evidence do we really have that AES is
>>> secure?
>> The fact that the USG likes using it, too.
> We know they *say in public* that it's acceptable. But do we know
> what they *actually use*?
>
>> That's also evidence for eliptic curve techniques btw.
> Same problem.
(Slightly tangential but on topic I hope)
Am I the only surprised that the NSA designed block ciphers SIMON and
SPECK is vulnerable to differential attacks?
http://eprint.iacr.org/2013/543
If I understand the history correctly NSA supported the development of
DES as well as SHA-0/SHA-1 and their contributions shows knowledge about
differential attacks at least as far back as 1977.
- --
Med vänlig hälsning, Yours
Joachim Strömbergson - Alltid i harmonisk svängning.
========================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlIoTj4ACgkQZoPr8HT30QH91gCg4aRb6tf1d6a5mOnBrF0/GP6c
NwIAnRuB99lNpz04/WG0trIQU9ZKnW9A
=4r0M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the cryptography
mailing list