<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html lang="de" xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /><title></title><style type="text/css">html,body{background-color:#fff;color:#333;line-height:1.4;font-family:sans-serif,Arial,Verdana,Trebuchet MS;}</style></head><body><p> </p>
<div ></div>
<p>Jon Callas schrieb am 31.07.2026 06:44 (GMT +02:00):</p>
<blockquote cite="mid:497FEB32-80D1-4B07-913E-9E422913CA3E@callas.org">
<pre>
Nonetheless, it is a new, actual attack and thus a real result for AI-based
cryptanalysis. Just not one that would be a publishable result if a human had
done it. It's like the checkers-playing dog.
(The joke is that someone's walking through a park and sees a man playing
checkers with a dog. He watches for a while and then exclaims, "That's amazing!
I've never seen a dog playing checkers before!" The guy playing against the dog
nods, and shrugs a bit and says, "Yeah, but he always loses." The AIs, like the
dog, are going to get better over time.
Jon
It sounds like the door opener device, where you have to enter a 4-digit code. At first it is 4^10 trys, but then - after a certain time of use - there is an abrasion on the buttons. So it is reducing the trys to 4^4. </pre>
<pre>Until someone figures out that you can colour the fingers with a blacklight/uv paint secretly - and that the fingerprint of the first, second, third and fourth has a difference in expression. So then you know the right sequence.</pre>
<p><br>Roland </p>
</blockquote></body></html>