<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html lang="de" xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /><title></title><style type="text/css">html,body{background-color:#fff;color:#333;line-height:1.4;font-family:sans-serif,Arial,Verdana,Trebuchet MS;}</style></head><body><p>Sounds a little bit like me in 2019 - believing in the BicMac index.<br><br>And then in 2020 there were weeks you could not buy a single BicMac. Had I just watched the "Event 201" videos in 2019...<br><br>(I think both is important: To care about present problems AND to anticipate problems!)<br><br>Roland</p>
<div ></div>
<p>Peter Gutmann via cryptography schrieb am 28.05.2026 16:55 (GMT +02:00):</p>
<blockquote cite="mid:SYBPR01MB63362E51D331889BEB6A2171EE092@SYBPR01MB6336.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com">
<pre>
Yup, and that's what the bollocks talk says (whose long-ago origins are a
Metrisec 2012 talk about the application of security metrics to vuln
management): We have multi-decade metrics showing us what the most high-
priority threats that need mitigation are, I use the OWASP top ten because
it's been going forever and most of the other things-to-worry-about lists have
the same stats. It doesn't matter if space aliens wielding physics
experiments land in 30 years time when there are AIs looking through your
code right now and finding 0day that doesn't care which quantum fashion
statement you've decided to go with.
Peter.
</pre>
</blockquote></body></html>