<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>On 03/08/2022 19:31, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMm+LwjeWN+gBcNjVzVYHsmRgND08MXgjHvzqH9+4tgZd8oeoQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">So I got
into a Twitter argument with Kenn White about the value of
'Data at Rest' security and I think I came up with a more
general insight. In short, the traditional Data-in-Motion
/ Data-at-Rest diad is insufficiently descriptive. What we
really have is a triad:</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Data at
Rest</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Data in
Use</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Data in
Motion</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">This
gives us the acronym 'RUM'.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Wow. It's good. How come nobody thought of that before?</p>
<p>iang<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>