<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Courier; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;" class=""><div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2" class=""><span style="font-size: 11pt;" class=""><div class="PlainText"><div class=""><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102);" class="">What about quantum entanglement? Entangled particles seems to be knowing the state of the each other in any instant. Perhaps a quantum machine that can do calculations with entangled particles will have such knowledge? I don't know.</span></div></div></span></font></div></div></div></blockquote>No. No information is transferred through quantum entanglement. This is a very common misunderstanding that's a product of a common *interpretation* of QM (involving wave function collapse) which has no real physical applications.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>QM is fully relativistic. The speed of light limit for propagation of information is fully there.</div><div><div> -- Jerry</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></div><br class=""></body></html>