<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:"Consolas",serif;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b>From:</b> cryptography <cryptography-bounces+bit=ungeared.com@metzdowd.com> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Mark Rousell<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, January 6, 2021 10:18 PM<br><b>To:</b> cryptography@metzdowd.com<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Cryptography] The Strange Story of Satoshi Nakamoto's Spelling Choices: Part 1.<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>On 05/01/2021 16:57, bit wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><p class=MsoNormal><b>Satoshi Was Consistently Inconsistent</b> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Perhaps, the biggest takeaway from our research is that Satoshi was highly inconsistent in his use of American and British spelling and he was inconsistent from the very beginning. Many have noticed that in the Bitcoin whitepaper the British spelling of "favour", however, seemingly no one had spotted that in the same paper, he used American spelling for "characterized" (British: "characterised"). Interestingly, this irregularity would have been consistent with the rules of Canadian English.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></blockquote><p>This was quoted on Dave Farber's IP list to which I replied with this:-<o:p></o:p></p><p>As a British Englisher I can conform that this is not the case. The use of "z" in words like "characterized" is entirely legitimate and consistent with British English. It is a spelling form used most often, from what I have observed, by British English speakers with an academic or university-educated background (but this is just my anecdotal observation). Nevertheless, "z" is considered legitimate in general.<o:p></o:p></p><p>If Satoshi Nakamoto is British or had a British education (particularly a university education) then it would be consistent for him to use "z" in such words.<o:p></o:p></p><p>There are of course no official rules for what constitutes British English but the nearest we have, the Oxford English Dictionary, states the following:<o:p></o:p></p><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><p>"<b>characterize</b> <b>-ise</b> v.t. describe character of [...]" [1]<o:p></o:p></p><p>(I have discarded the pronunciation guide characters)<o:p></o:p></p></blockquote><p>Note that there is no separate entry in this version of the dictionary[1] for "characterise".<o:p></o:p></p><p>I think we can conclude that "ize" in this scenario is a legitimate British English spelling.<o:p></o:p></p><p>It’s quite interesting. I think most people outside of UK assume that -ise etc., is your default spelling. For instance, BBC’s site seems to prefer it. But the bigger issue is that Satoshi wasn’t just inconsistent, he was inconsistent even when it came to the same words: decentrali/s/z/ed, optimi/s/z/ed etc. You can find the chart on our site. Could this be natural? – I.E., would your typical educated Brit go back and force? Also, what about words like: optimi/s/z/ation?<o:p></o:p></p><p>Footnote:-<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>1: The Concise Oxford Dictionary, 7th edition, 1983, ISBN 0-19-861131-5. <o:p></o:p></p><p><o:p> </o:p></p><p>P.S. Further to my earlier message, my British English Londoner mother (aged 84) tells me that she was originally taught at school the "z" spelling of words like "characterize" or "legitimize". It was only later that she noticed other people using the "s" version.<o:p></o:p></p><p>Send regards to your mom ))<o:p></o:p></p><pre>-- <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>Mark Rousell<o:p></o:p></pre><pre> <o:p></o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>Also, I have been curious about coding in the UK. When you learn to code – do you use British spelling for variables? And generally speaking – global dominance of American pop culture must be affecting spelling norms?<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre> <o:p></o:p></pre></div></body></html>