[Cryptography] Has quantum cryptanalysis actually achieved anything?

Sebastian Stache zeb at qtt.se
Sun Feb 23 20:29:52 EST 2025


On 2025-02-24 00:59, Christian Huitema wrote:
> 
> On 2/23/2025 9:42 AM, efc--- via cryptography wrote:
>> ...
>> I see another fun paper taking form! ;)
> 
> Here is another potential paper: what will come first, quantum 
> computing, or nuclear fusion as source of electricity? Compare 
> investments over time between quantum computing and nuclear fusion. 
> Track parallel advances, such as "the tokamak could contain plasma for 5 
> milli seconds" vs. "we factored number 15". Track the definition of next 
> 10 years over time.
> 
> -- Christian Huitema
> 
> _______________________________________________
> The cryptography mailing list
> cryptography at metzdowd.com
> https://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

One could argue that practical (i.e. with a net energy gain) nuclear 
fusion already is a fact. Stars do it, and even humans (albeit in very 
limited ways so far). By contrast, at least as far as I'm aware, there's 
no example of practical quantum computing, and it may be that it's 
fundamentally impossible.

Sebastian






More information about the cryptography mailing list