[Cryptography] My Identity as Satoshi Nakamoto

Peter Fairbrother peter at tsto.co.uk
Mon Oct 14 09:20:18 EDT 2024


On 14/10/2024 04:11, Satoshi Nakamoto via cryptography wrote:
> Dear community members,
> Today, I have decided to reveal my identity as Satoshi Nakamoto, the
> creator of Bitcoin. From the beginning, my goal was to create a
> decentralized and secure digital currency capable of empowering people
> around the world.

Well, you failed miserably at that.

Checking for double spending, while in theory decentralise-able, is in
practice done by one of two groups.

Secure? Seems there are a lot of scams, no refunds, no real anonymity -
a public blockchain for chrissake, if you know someone's wallet you can
see all past and subsequent spending and income  - not too secure IMO.

And Bitcoin is not a currency, you can't conveniently buy things (except
drugs and guns) with it. It doesn't scale for buying coffee or groceries.

It is a greater fool bubble based on zero intrinsic worth.


>   Verifiable proofs:
> - Digital signature of the first Bitcoin blocks

Err, how does knowing Satoshi's public key prove your identity as
Satoshi? Now if you sign something with it ..

> - Original emails used in Bitcoin development (satoshi at vistomail.com
> <http://vistomail.com>, satoshi at anonymousspeech.com  > <http://anonymousspeech.com>, satoshin at gmx.com <http://gmx.com>)
And how does knowing any of those email addresses prove your identity as
Satoshi?

Even emails actually coming from or replies to emails sent to them
wouldn't convince me, Mike Weber, assuming if I trusted him,  who used
to own vistomail and anonymousspeech, unfortunately didn't renew the
domains and there is a new owner - and wasn't there something in the
Peter Wright trial about the satoshin at gmx.com email being hacked?



See, the thing is, Satoshi would know that that is just a load of old
bollocks, and no kind of proof of identity. Especially to a group of
cryptographers. He would know what to provide.

And it's deliberately faked "evidence". So no chance. I vote to block
him. We have had enough of this crap.



Peter Fairbrother



More information about the cryptography mailing list