[Cryptography] Missing symbol annoyance with unicode technical standard.

[Bill Stewart]

On 12/17/2024 3:12 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Anyway, it is somewhat unfortunate that Emoji had to happen at all,
 > it is not clear that needing a glyph for a cryptography SIG
 > warrants more fluff in Unicode.

Agreed. I'm much more often affected by the lack of a goose emoji in the 
Unicodes or whatever get used by social media...