[Cryptography] Incentive Politics

[Jeremy Stanley]

On 2023-10-10 10:41:55 +0200 (+0200), Sebastian Stache via cryptography wrote:
[...]
> In my opinion, there is no "unwinding" of blockchains, and using
> such terms when referring to the act of wilful destruction is at
> best euphoric.
[...]

Can you clarify the "destruction" in legal terms? The original chain
hasn't been "destroyed" and you're welcome to keep it for posterity,
print it out and mount it on your wall, or whatever. Others no
longer considering that chain valid hardly constitutes its
"destruction" but merely "invalidation." Is invalidating things now
a crime?
-- 
Jeremy Stanley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20231011/0da69def/attachment.sig>