[Cryptography] Duh, why aren't most embedded TRNGs designed this way?

[Kent Borg]

On 5/25/21 11:33 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> Also what we are after is not 'entropy' it is 'unguessability'.

An important point.

I've wrote a post that works through some of the consequences, but then 
I started over. Haven't gotten into a form I am happy with yet. (Because 
all who worship to the Countable Entropy gods will be upset, I want to 
be as clear as possible.)


-kb