[Cryptography] Anonymous rendezvous (was Business opportunities in crypto)
Salz, Rich
rsalz at akamai.com
Thu May 6 12:24:28 EDT 2021
Don’t feed … oh heck.
* If NewEgg and its reviewers were strongly pseudonymous, and their product links
were hashes to immutable data or a third party signature to mutable data, it would
work even better.
Why would it be better and in what ways? Please be specific, and don’t just do a hand-wave about it being the way of the future.
Instead of being able to easily see that my colleague Jon, whom I trust, wrote something. I know have to maintain my own directory of digests to names? And not just me, but everyone? Please explain what the *benefit* of this is.
I don’t want the whole world to post things pseudonymously. I want to filter based on the identifiers that I can understand and already have decades of knowledge about. But you seem to want to throw that away. Again: why?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20210506/e0b5c496/attachment.htm>
More information about the cryptography
mailing list