[Cryptography] A new, more efficient consensus protocol

Greg greg at kinostudios.com
Thu Jan 14 19:30:11 EST 2021


Hi Vincent,

> On Jan 14, 2021, at 6:55 AM, Vincent Strom via cryptography <cryptography at metzdowd.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> In case the link in my previous post is not working, the paper is also available at proofofluck.org/paper.pdf <http://proofofluck.org/paper.pdf>. I'd really appreciate if you could take a look and let me know what you think.

Section 2 is rather difficult for me to understand. Could you explain in simpler language what prevents someone from mining away using faster hardware to increase their odds of winning? How is this different from PoW?

Thanks,
Greg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20210114/0e8346d2/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20210114/0e8346d2/attachment.sig>


More information about the cryptography mailing list