[Cryptography] Anonymous rendezvous (was Business opportunities in crypto)
Sid Spry
sid at aeam.us
Thu Apr 15 16:33:47 EDT 2021
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021, at 1:33 PM, Jerry Leichter wrote:
>
> Look, we all know how this kind of thing works in practice; we've done
> it forever, without any cryptography. The reason I bring this up is
> the long-standing false claim that public-key cryptography allows two
> parties who've never interacted previously to talk securely to each
> other, without any other parties being involved. But it doesn't work
> like that - it *can't* work like that - in any meaningful sense.
>
It can, with caveat. Pick two: decentralized, secure, easy to use/memorize/convey.
If it's decentralized and secure you end up with cryptographic IDs like onion addresses.
If it's secure and easy to use you have a DNS-like system.
The above two-of-three is basically this entire discussion.
More information about the cryptography
mailing list