[Cryptography] Is ASN.1 still the thing?
nico at cryptonector.com
Sun Nov 19 20:34:07 EST 2017
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 01:04:03PM -0800, Ray Dillinger wrote:
> Why, indeed, should anyone be using a serialized representation of
> IEEE754 floats that doesn't roundtrip? You can express them in hex with
> a hex point if you like (some) human readability, but the serialization
> is now exact and specifies an unambiguous meaning.
Did you not read? The problem is that not all codecs use the same
parsed representation of real numbers.
> Of course, nobody can propose that to the ASN.1 standardization
> committee now, and if one could they'd probably have rejected it.
It'd be useless to addressing this problem unless you also had the ITU-T
dictate that only IEEE754 may be used to represent parsed real numbers.
Which in turn would mean no arbitrary precision real numbers, and no
More information about the cryptography