[Cryptography] NSA says China's supercomputing advances put US at risk

Jerry Leichter leichter at lrw.com
Fri Mar 17 07:28:40 EDT 2017


>>> NSA, DOE say China's supercomputing advances put U.S. at risk
>> The tl;dr version:
>> 
>> Fnord fnord China fnord supercomputers fnord more money fnord.  Did we mention
>> China fnord?  And MORE MONEY?
> 
> A few years ago, s/China/Soviet Union/. Same pitch.
OK, we're all properly cynical.  Just because someone will potentially make a great deal of money out of solving a "problem", doesn't mean there isn't an actual problem hiding in there somewhere.  And some of the people who would get the money actually *are* experts in the appropriate field.  (Of course, I guess you can subscribe to our President's attitude that "so-called experts" are all liars anyway.)

> Somehow, the massive data centers built by Google, Amazon, Microsoft or
> IBM do not seem to count...
Actually ... they don't.  I can only speak to what Google builds.  It's indeed absolutely massive at an unprecedented scale that few on the outside can even begin to wrap their heads around ... but it's optimized for a large but certainly not universal set of problems.  Want to run a highly parallel, loosely-coupled, data-intensive, mainly integer and string manipulation computation?  We've got something perfect for you.  Want to run a massive, tightly-coupled, data-light (relative to computation) floating point computation?  There are better designs out there.

We can debate whether problems of this sort are important.  We can debate whether Google-like approaches, even if slower, are "good enough" by now to deal with them.  We can certainly debate, even if it's important to develop machines to solve such problems, whether government money should be invested in them - one can certainly argue that if there's actual demand, private money will be available.  (Note that if you look at the history of super-computing, even when commercial enterprises like CDC and IBM where involved, many, perhaps most, of their customers were relying on government contracts one way or another, so (a) the line is rather fuzzy; (b) it's not a trivial question.)

But just outright dismissing the whole issue as "more pandering for a bigger place at the government trough" just doesn't cut it.

BTW, I'm sure Baidu has Google-like data centers in China, too.

                                                        -- Jerry



More information about the cryptography mailing list