[Cryptography] combining lots of lousy RNGs ... or not

Kent Borg kentborg at borg.org
Wed Nov 23 17:17:53 EST 2016

On 11/23/2016 01:16 PM, ianG wrote:
> If you can undo the random, then it ain't random. It's shared.
> Using the definition of "random == unpredictable to adversary".

In a sense each entropy source needs to be consider others almost as 
adversaries, to be sure they are independent.


More information about the cryptography mailing list