[Cryptography] Proposal of a fair contract signing protocol

mok-kong shen mok-kong.shen at t-online.de
Thu Jun 30 17:57:09 EDT 2016

Am 30.06.2016 um 18:38 schrieb Allen:
>     In step 1 Alice is bound to
>     something but Bob to nothing. But that doesn't matter "at all" to
>     my definition of fairness...
> In that case, your definition of fairness looks like it has no
> usefulness--I can't see any application that would benefit from it, nor
> can I see anyone who would be interested in using it.

I personally like to interpret this to mean that you in any case
haven't found any logical errors in what I claim about my protocol.

M. K. Shen

More information about the cryptography mailing list